[Time in therapeutic range (TTR) and follow-up of patients on vitamin K antagonist: A cohort analysis]. / Utilité du TTR (temps passé dans la cible thérapeutique) dans le suivi des patients sous antivitamine K : analyse d'une cohorte de patients.

INTRODUCTION: Despite the increasing utilization of direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) prescriptions, vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) remain the treatment of choice for treating and preventing thromboembolic events. The morbidity and mortality of VKAs are partly due to the difficulty of keeping the patient within the therapeutic range. For patients treated by VKA, time in therapeutic range (TTR) is a quality parameter of treatment, widely used in clinical trials but rarely by prescribers. It is well established that its use correlates with the risk of hemorrhage, thrombosis or mortality. We studied this parameter in a cohort of patients to evaluate the quality of their therapeutic follow-up and tried to identify risk factors for low TTR. METHODS: The study was made in collaboration with LaboSud Oc Biologie for a duration of 4 months. It included 3387 patients representing 2,4029 INR. We calculated the patients' TTR. The laboratory transmitted to us the sex and age of each patient and the VKA molecule used, the therapeutic range and the specialty of the prescriber. We then analyzed the odds ratio associated with these different factors. RESULTS: The mean TTR was 68%, close to the TTR recommended by scientific societies. Patient's sex was the only statistically correlated factor, with a worse equilibrium in females taking VKAs (OR=1.22, 95% CI: 1.06-1.39, P=0.00552). Many factors usually correlated with poor equilibrium under VKA have not been studied due to lack of information. CONCLUSION: Given the context of economic restriction and the TTR of our cohort close to the recommended 70%, there would be no benefit in terms of safety to prefer DOAC for the patients involved in this study. Regular monitoring of the individual patient's as well as the cohort's TTR should optimize the management of patients receiving VKAs.

Asynchronous regional brain volume losses in presymptomatic to moderate AD.

To determine if rates and locations of brain volume loss associated with AD are phase-specific, occurring prior to clinical onset and at later stages, we performed longitudinal volumetric MRI analysis on 155 subjects enrolled in a prospective study of aging and dementia. Subjects were divided by Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR) scale into stages of Normal (CDR 0 --> 0), Very Mild (CDR 0 --> 0.5 and 0.5 --> 0.5), Mild (CDR 0.5 --> 1.0 and 1.0 --> 1.0) and Moderate (CDR 1.0 --> 2.0 and 2.0 --> 2.0) dementia. Rates of volume change in CSF spaces, lobar and medial temporal lobe regions were analyzed for group differences across stages. Annual rates of ventricular volume change differed between non-demented and very mild group (p<0.01). In later severity stages, ventricular, temporal, basal ganglia-thalamic region and total volumes show change. Rates of volume loss increase as dementia progresses, but not uniformly in all regions. These regional and phase-specific volume changes form targets for monitoring disease-modifying therapies at clinically relevant, defined stages of dementia.

Natural history of cognitive decline in the old old.

OBJECTIVE: To prospectively examine the occurrence and outcome of cognitive decline in healthy, community-dwelling elders. METHODS: Ninety-five elders (mean age 84 years) who at entry had no cognitive impairment were followed for up to 13 years. Cognitive decline was defined as obtaining either a Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR) = 0.5 or Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) score < 24 on two examinations. RESULTS: Three outcomes of aging were determined: intact cognition, persistent cognitive decline without progression to dementia, and dementia. Whereas 49% remained cognitively intact, 51% developed cognitive decline. Mean follow-up to first CDR 0.5 was 3.8 years and age at conversion was 90.0 years. Those who remained cognitively intact had better memory at entry and were less likely to have APOE4 than those who developed cognitive decline. Of the 48 participants with cognitive decline, 27 (56%) developed dementia (CDR > or =1) a mean of 2.8 years later. Participants with cognitive decline who progressed to dementia had poorer confrontation naming at the time of their first CDR 0.5 than those with persistent cognitive decline who did not progress during follow-up. CONCLUSION: The old old are at high risk for developing cognitive decline but many will not progress to dementia in the next 2 to 3 years or even beyond. These findings are important for understanding the prognosis of cognitive decline and for the design of treatment trials for AD. APOE genotype is a risk factor for cognitive decline.